Why it doesn’t matter whether games are art


Good art is about expressing something infinite in a way that’s succinct and appealing. Jason Rohrer is one of the designers at the forefront of the ‘games as art’ movement. Passage is Rohrer’s most famous game, and it’s a game which you really should play. You can download it here and I’d really recommend that you play it before you read any further.

Jason Rohrer’s games are metaphorical; they make it clear that they aren’t just about gameplay or graphics. Passage achieves a consistency in presentation which is rare. Everything in the game is focused towards creating a deeper meaning.



The graphical style of Passage is nostalgic. Most people that play the game will be aware that graphics were once simpler than they are now, and Rohrer’s game goes back to the visual styles of games of the past. It reminds players of their own journey through life, of the games they have played, and of how quickly time passes.

The audio is similarly simplistic. The slow and soft 8-bit style sound mimics the game music of the past and gives Passage its own sombre, almost morose feel. This game is genuinely sad; and I can’t remember another game which is like that.



Passage isn’t a game which immediately grabbed my attention. I didn’t love it when I first played it. ‘Art games’ often seem to be about little more than unique gameplay mechanics and nostalgic graphics and sound. That’s what I thought Passage was. But when you explore beneath the surface it’s clear that Rohrer has created something which is beautiful, coherent, and meaningful. Whether or not you call Passage art seems to be beyond the point. Why are people so interested to call games art? Games can do some things which art does, but games can do things which go beyond a simple definition of ‘art’.

Passage begins to bring the elements of games together. It doesn’t really fit in to regular reviews; you can’t give Passage a 3 for graphics and a 2 for gameplay. Passage is a complete entity, and it shows that games might be able to art after all.



  1. I think its less about calling a game “art”, but acknowledging that video game can be as art. A game is a game, but too many people believe it is one dimensional, and purely a way to pass time mindlessly. Recognizing a video games as an artistic medium changes the view on gaming in general, and opens the door for more players and genres.

    1. I agree entirely; games really can be artistic. I think the medium is still in its infancy, relative to other art forms at least. The difficulty is that some people have too narrow a definition of art. You make a good point; calling games art certainly clears the way for more serious discussion about games.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: